In the article, Kaprow talks about the blurring of art and life, which "charge everyday with metaphoric power"
His argument is that since art has shifted away from the conventional estheticized objects in galleries and into it's life sources, his works are art. Yet at the same time, because his works stray so far from the conventional, they are not art.
This article has expanded my ideas on what art is by understanding the paradox that is contemporary art???? Therefore, I understand that the things I personally don't consider art can still be art because they "charge everyday with metaphoric power".
Similarly, this paradox of art also relates to the theme of the class because while we can do the assignments the traditional way, we can also branch out into life and do them in ways that are far removed from the traditional concepts of art.